Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Small-scale fishing
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 03:25, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Small-scale fishing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- JamaUtil (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
"colloquial term for intercepted cell phone communication". Article has only one source, which doesn't appear to mention the term. The only topics that come up during a search are about fishing. Christopher Connor (talk) 11:21, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Allegedly "its existence has been widely reported" but no evidence provided to that effect. I am tempted to say hoax. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:52, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:36, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge, I came across this article while looking for documentation of how bin Laden was tracked. The technology does exist, but this is a truly bizarre name for it. The existence of this technology should be merged to one of the interception articles. 137.187.194.154 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:37, 24 May 2011 (UTC).[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Hidden category: